2008

Simultaneous Ultra Fast Framing and Streak Imaging

altFor this test the Ultra Fast Framing Camera was programmed to frame at 50 million fps, with 20ns (nanoseconds) interframe time (leading edge to leading edge), and 10ns exposure times. This gave a total recording time of 170 ns from the start of the first frame to the end of the last frame.

altOptoscope SC-10 Streak Camera: The streak camera was built around the SC-10 main unit with 8mm photocathode and 15×20 active screen area. The main unit can be used for streak systems which provide down to 2 psec (picosecond) temporal resolution. The camera was fitted with the Slow Sweep Unit with programmable sweep speeds from 330 ps/mm (picoseconds per millimeter) to 5 ms/mm (milliseconds per millimeter). The camera was also fitted with a removable 25mm MCP intensifier which, in this case, was run at minimum gain due to the brightness of the event. If needed it could have been removed. The system also included a fiber optic coupled CCD camera to capture and digitize the streak image with 1360 × 1024 pixels digitized to 12 bits.

The Ultra Fast Streak Camera was programmed to streak at 100ns/mm (nanoseconds per millimeter) giving a 2 μsec (microsecond) time window and using a 100μm (micrometer) slit, giving a time resolution of 10ns, which matched the exposure time of the framing camera. The 2:1 de-magnification of the streak camera input optics allowed the use of a 16mm slit on the image plane of the 9th optical port of the Framing Camera.

To prove the operation of this Dual Camera System a triggered spark gap with a 2mm main gap was imaged. The main gap was imaged into the primary image plane of the framing camera using a Nikon lens set of 50mm (f1.4) and 105mm (f2.5) lenses configured front to front to give ≈2X magnification. Having access to the input optics of the streak camera, the alignment of the images into the framing camera and streak camera was easily achieved using the real time focus modes of both cameras.

Both cameras were programmed for the appropriate operating parameters such that the framing camera pre-triggered the spark gap. Knowing the trigger delay of the triggered spark gap, a time delay of about 1.52μsec was programmed into both the framing camera and streak camera so that the breakdown would coincide with the recording time window of both cameras.

Several test shots were taken to ensure the jitter of the triggered spark gap in air would repeatedly occur during our recording time window. Trigger jitter of the air spark gap was typically 100 to 250 nsec.

Test Results

Framing results (Figure 2) show two dimensional images of the initial breakdown of the trigger gap that occurred sometime between frames F2 and F3, followed slightly later by the main gap break down. In the framing data we see the breakdowns occur but, as there is dead time between frame recording times, data is lost during that dead time. Programming the framing camera with no dead time between frames will minimize lost data but the total recording time window will be reduced proportionally.

The streak image (Figure 3), with time measurements made from the data, shows that the initial trigger breakdown (lower earlier portion of the streak) takes place about 50ns prior to the main breakdown. The Streak Data also shows continuous recorded data as the main breakdown grows in magnitude with a rise time of about 400ns, with no dead time in the recording data. In the intensity profile trace (Figure 4) you can easily see the initial trigger pulse breakdown ahead of the main gap breakdown.

The commercial version of this system is now available with both the framing camera and streak camera rigidly attached to a single mounting plate with adjustable critical alignments for x-y-z positions and with 90° turning optics so that both cameras sit in the same orientation (Figure 5). The footprint is about 800mm long and 500mm wide allowing both horizontal and vertical mounting of the system for microscopy applications. Both cameras can be run independently if needed or combined and controlled from one computer. Both systems are controlled via Ethernet communications allowing both wire and fiber optics for long distance or high noise environments applications.

Conclusion

A commercially available Ultra Fast Framing and Streak Camera configuration can easily be set up and operated with extreme accuracy in data acquisition. Data also shows that the framing camera offers the advantage of two dimensional recording of image data over a large field of view. Conversely the streak camera data shows continuous recording of spatial, intensity and temporal data in the single dimension of the slit width. The framing camera could have been programmed for a minimum or for no dead time between frames but this would have limited the total record window. The streak speed could have been increased by orders of magnitude to see greater detail in the first 50 to 200ns of the initial breakdown, but this would have shortened the total record time.

This article was written by Frank Kosel, Senior Sales & Applications Engineer for high speed imaging systems at IMC/Photo-Sonics, Inc. (Burbank, CA); Dr. Patrick Summ, Managing Director of Optronis GmbH (Kehl, Germany); and Wai Chan, Managing Director of Specialised Imaging Ltd. (Hertfordshire, UK). For more information, contact Mr. Kosel at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., or visit http://info.hotims.com/15142-200.