‘Soft X-Ray’ Detector Could Improve Breast Cancer Imaging
- Created: Thursday, 01 November 2012
New X-ray technology minimizes harmful exposure and allows better breast imaging.
While clear imaging is extremely important in diagnosing breast cancer from mammograms, there is also concern about exposing the patient to too much radiation from repeated X-rays. But that may soon change, says Krishna Mandal, an associate professor of electrical engineering at the University of South Carolina (USC), Columbia, who led the team that built a new type of Xray detector that offers tremendous potential in breast cancer detection and treatment.
“There’s nothing available on the market that covers this range of X-rays,” Mandal said. “Nobody has explored this region, and there will be many innovations that will result from our being able to do so, particularly when it comes to medical imaging.”
X-rays are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, which ranges from low-energy radio waves to high-energy gamma rays. X-rays are on the high-energy end of the spectrum, just below gamma rays – they’re more energetic than ultraviolet light, which is more energetic than visible light.
As they described in Applied Physics Letters, the USC engineers have developed a laboratory-scale device that sensitively detects what are called “soft Xrays” — those on the lowest end of the X-ray energy scale. At the other end of the X-ray spectrum are hard X-rays. The typical “X-ray” taken at a doctor’s or dentist’s office is a black-and-white photograph showing where hard X-rays were able to penetrate (the black area) or unable to penetrate (the white area) the object between the X-ray source and detector.
“If you take mammography as an example, hard X-rays pose difficulties,” Mandal said. “First, they have very high energy, and so we have to minimize exposure to them.” Soft X-ray devices are potentially less harmful to patients than those based on hard X-rays, he said. “And more importantly, the soft X-rays interact with calcifications in the tissue,” he added. “Hard X-rays do not — they just pass through calcium deposits.”
Not showing up as opaque as bone does in X-rays, calcium deposits represent a promising target for detailed soft X-ray mapping, Mandal said. He sees the new soft X-ray detectors as being at the forefront of a new way of imaging breast tissue, so that physicians can follow the progression of calcification over time.
“It’s common for women even under 40 years of age to have calcifications,” Mandal said. “It’s critical to know whether it exists in the tissue and especially whether it is spreading. But to see that, we need very high resolution detection systems, which is what we’ve made. These detectors are instantaneous, realtime, and will be able to operate at room temperature with high resolution.”
Mandal’s team built the detector through epitaxial growth of silicon carbide on wafers of 4H-SiC. They were tested for response to soft X-rays at both the Los Alamos National Laboratory and Brookhaven National Laboratory.
The resulting detectors exhibited high sensitivity for soft Xrays (50 to 10,000 electron volts). There are no commercially available soft X-ray detectors covering this range, Mandal said, and comparison with an off-the-shelf ultraviolet detector showed a much more robust response for soft X-rays with the new device.