Alternative Way of Shifting Mass To Move a Spherical Robot
- Thursday, 04 January 2007
A payload would change its position by lengthening and shortening suspension cables.
An alternative method of controlled shifting of the center of mass has been proposed as a means of locomotion of a robot that comprises mostly a payload inside a hollow, approximately spherical shell. The method would be applicable to robots that include rigid, semirigid, or flexible inflated shells, including those of the “beach-ball rover” type, variants of which have been described in several previous NASA Tech Briefs articles.
A prior method, to which the method now proposed would be an alternative, was described in “‘Beach-Ball’ Robotic Rovers” (NPO-19272), NASA Tech Briefs, Vol. 19, No. 11 (November 1995), page 83. To recapitulate: Three diametral tethers approximately perpendicular to each other would be attached to the shell, effectively defining an approximate Cartesian coordinate system within the shell. A control box containing motors and power and control circuits would move itself along the tethers and adjust the lengths of the tethers in a coordinated fashion to shift the center of gravity and thereby cause the shell to roll in a desired direction.
The method now proposed calls for suspending a payload by use of four or more cables that would be anchored to the inner surface of the sphere. In this method, the anchor points would not be diametrally opposite points defining Cartesian axes. The payload, which includes the functional analog of the aforementioned control box, would contain winches that would shorten or lengthen the cables in a coordinated manner to shift the position of the payload within the shell.
In a typical case, the locomotion system would include four cables anchored at approximately the corners of a regular tetrahedron (see figure). Optionally, one could use more than four cables for redundancy against potential failure and/or as a means of distributing the weight of the payload to multiple anchor points to reduce localized stress on the spherical shell. The arrangement of anchor points would not be critical as long as they defined at least three different axes of motion in at least two different planes; hence, the proposed method would afford robustness of motion control in the face of deformation of the spherical shell.
Simple wires could be used to connect the payload to any sensors mounted on the outer or inner surface of the shell. The wires would have to be long enough to reach the maximum distance, and would have to hang slack when the distance was less. Because there would be little rotation between the payload and the spherical shell, it is unlikely that the wires would become tangled; however, one might wish to include spring-loaded retractors to minimize the probability of entanglement.
In the case of a flexible shell, all the cables supporting the payload could be retracted or extended to some extent to increase or decrease, respectively, the pressure of gas inside the shell. Another option would be to include spring loaded supporting cables not connected to winches, in addition to those that were connected to winches; this option may make it possible to reduce the number of winches while obtaining an adequate range of motion.
Yet another option would be to use rigid rods and linear actuators instead of cables and winches. However, rods and linear actuators would probably weigh more than would cables and winches. Moreover, this option would not be compatible with a flexible shell.
This work was done by James Lux of Caltech for NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. For further information, access the Technical Support Package (TSP) free online at www.techbriefs.com/tsp under the Mechanics category. NPO-30491
This Brief includes a Technical Support Package (TSP).
Alternative Way of Shifting Mass To Move a Spherical Robot (reference NPO-30491) is currently available for download from the TSP library.
Please Login at the top of the page to download.