A relatively simple and economical process and apparatus for concentrating hydrogen peroxide from aqueous solution at the point of use have been invented. The need for this or a similar invention arises for the following reasons:

  • The highest commercial grade of hydrogen peroxide has a concentration of 70 volume percent.
  • Concentrations of more than 80 volume percent are required in some industrial and some military propulsion applications.
  • Prior methods of concentration of hydrogen peroxide are expensive and can entail production of quantities larger than can be utilized immediately. The necessity of storing and handling the excess concentrated hydrogen peroxide poses a safety problem.
An Aqueous Hydrogen Peroxide Solution flows within the outer shell, inthe interstices between the tubular membranes. Water diffuses from the solution into the interiors of the membranes, where the flowing sweep gas carries it away.

The heart of the apparatus is a vessel (see figure) comprising an outer shell containing tubular membranes made of a polymer that is significantly more permeable by water than by hydrogen peroxide. The aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide to be concentrated is fed through the interstitial spaces between the tubular membranes. An initially dry sweep gas is pumped through the interiors of the tubular membranes. Water diffuses through the membranes and is carried away as water vapor mixed into the sweep gas. Because of the removal of water, the hydrogen peroxide solution flowing from the vessel at the outlet end is more concentrated than that fed into the vessel at the inlet end.

The concentration process as described thus far would ordinarily and preferably be run in a continuous, counter-flow mode. Optionally, it could be run in a batch mode. The rate of removal of water can be increased by increasing the rate of flow of the sweep gas. Also, the water capacity of the sweep gas and, hence, the rate of removal of water can be increased by heating the sweep gas, taking care to keep the temperature less than the lower of either (1) the boiling point of the hydrogen peroxide solution, (2) the temperature above which the hydrogen peroxide decomposes spontaneously, or (3) the maximum temperature that the membrane can endure without deteriorating. The sweep gas can be air, nitrogen, or any other gas that can be conveniently supplied in dry form and does not react chemically with hydrogen peroxide.

The selections of the membrane, outer-shell, and plumbing materials are governed largely by the following criteria:

  • All of the affected materials should be chemically nonreactive with hydrogen peroxide at the highest concentration expected to be encountered.
  • The membrane material should be capable of sustaining a high flux of water so that the total membrane area needed to sustain a given rate of removal of water can be made as small as possible.
  • The selectivity of the membrane, here defined as ratio between its permeability by water and its permeability by hydrogen peroxide, should preferably be greater than 2.

Suitable membrane materials include polysulfone and perfluorinated polymers having sulfonic or carboxylic ionic functional groups.

The viability of the invention has been demonstrated in tests. For example, in one test in which the membrane material was a perfluorosulfonic polymer, the sweep gas was air at ambient atmospheric pressure, and the temperature was 42 °C, a 69.6- percent hydrogen peroxide solution was concentrated to 85.4 percent in 80-percent yield.

This work was done by Clyde F. Parrish of Kennedy Space Center. This invention has been patented by NASA (U.S. Patent No. 7,122,166).

Inquiries concerning nonexclusive or exclusive license for its commercial development should be addressed to

the Kennedy Innovative Partnerships Office at (321) 867-7158.

Refer to KSC-12666.

NASA Tech Briefs Magazine

This article first appeared in the October, 2007 issue of NASA Tech Briefs Magazine.

Read more articles from the archives here.