Robots are capable of very precise motion, but must be guided with precision in order to fulfill their potential. Consider the task of guiding a robotic surgeon’s arm to suture a wound or insert a catheter. A human surgeon, with all his or her knowledge and experience, is required to practice where to probe, cut, or sew before he or she can develop the necessary skills to make a clean suture with the right degree of tension at the right depth or an incision of the right depth. In contrast, a robotic surgeon’s arm can move more consistently and accurately than that of the best human surgeon.

The key is to guide the robotsurgeon’s arm with human expertise, and provide the surgeon controlling the robot arm with closed-loop motion control in order to ensure that the robotic arm does what it is supposed to do. With that in mind, a new robotic control technology called haptics is being developed to provide sensory feedback to the human surgeon while helping to guide the robotic motion.

Sensory Feedback

Figure 1. Haptic devices, such as this one provided by Force Dimension, allow human operators to get a feel for what the robot is doing.
Haptic devices are input-output devices that track a user’s physical manipulations and provide realistic touch sensations in coordination with a computer that, in turn, drives a robotic motion system. Haptics provide sensory feedback to the controls and allows users to effectively touch, feel, and manipulate three-dimensional objects. They also can precisely control the position of the robot’s end effector (the end of the robot arm that holds the tool). In addition, 3D boundary information can be factored into the robot’s control profile to prevent motion into restricted areas where it could cause harm, making the use of haptic controls ideal for robotic surgery applications.

The technology also enables the amplification, or “scaling,” of dimensions between the robotic end of the system and the human operator to enable the operator to make movement inputs that are comfortable at human scale while controlling robotic operations on a much smaller scale. This capability has powerful implications in the field of nanotechnology, including nanosurgery, but can also be extended to other operations to be handled at the molecular or near-molecular scale. Consider providing the ability to actually “feel” cells or molecules and manipulate them using precise robotic actuators.

“There are three technologies involved in haptics: the mechanics, the electronics, and the software,” said Sébastien Grange, PhD, co-founder and vice president of operations, Asia Pacific, for Force Dimension, a Nyon, Switzerland-based developer of haptic technology. “And it takes the latest innovations in all three, working together, to provide a realistic experience.”

The computer system that interfaces with haptic I/O devices must be able to exercise deterministic real-time control in order to provide realistic feedback to the operator. For example, in order to simulate the “feel” of a surface being probed, the computer must interact with the haptic I/O device at least 1,000 times per second to read control inputs and provide force outputs back to the haptic device. Otherwise, a human operator will feel vibrations or perceive nonexistent discontinuities (roughness) on the surface. Precise and time-deterministic feedback is also important to ensure safety of operation. As mentioned above, using boundary information coupled with realtime position feedback, the haptic device can be prevented from moving the robot end effector into areas that must be excluded.

Figure 1 shows a typical haptic input device. To provide tactile feedback to the operator, the device incorporates DC motors that are capable of responding very smoothly to control commands, with no inertia generated. Force Dimension uses motors that are very similar to the ones used on NASA’s Mars rovers. The company’s software monitors position information from a rotary encoder on each of the three axes and converts it into a set of coordinates in three-dimensional space. Then, based on the coordinates, the system computes how much force to generate back to the operator, and this process is repeated 1,000 times per second.

Because of the requirement for highspeed control and absolute determinism in timing of its operations, a real-time operating system must be used to control the motion. A general-purpose operating system couldn’t be counted upon to meet the deterministic timing requirements of the application. This is because these operating systems are optimized for data processing performance, not for I/O response. To handle the real-time requirement in its haptic control systems, Force Dimension provides a library of device control functions that work with different real-time operating systems (RTOSs), including INtime from TenAsys Corp. (Beaverton, OR).

Haptics and Medical Robotics

Figure 2. SRI and NASA evaluated a haptic-controlled remote surgery device in zero-G during multiple test flights.
To get an idea of a real application for haptic robotic control technology, consider the field of robotic surgery. Recently, the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and NASA teamed up to explore the idea of performing surgery in space. SRI had been interested in trying out a robot that it had developed to perform surgery in environments where the surgeon would operate surgical tools remotely, and NASA was looking for a way to perform surgery in a cleanroom environment on the International Space Station.

The test of the technology was to use the Force Dimension haptic device to control a robot arm holding a pair of tweezers to suture a wound. To make the test more relevant to NASA’s needs, it was done in a zero-G environment (a NASA plane with the equipment inside flew a series of parabolic zero-gravity flights while the instruments were tried out). Information on the positioning of the automated tweezers was fed back to the haptic device, and in the process, the feeling of the stitching process was “scaled up” in dimension so that control inputs were easy to make by the human surgeon, yet the actual movements of the robot surgeon were scaled appropriately for the task. Visual feedback to help guide the process was provided by a video camera that was controlled via a PC running the Windows OS.

The use of real-time OSs and Windows is typical in high-performance robotic systems. The RTOS handles the deterministic control while Windows supports human interface and data processing functions. Force Dimension has chosen to support the INtime RTOS from TenAsys because both operating systems (INtime and Windows) can be run reliably on a single computer, making the integration process much easier and saving cost compared to other system configurations that use multiple computers to support the real-time and general-purpose processing requirements. Using an RTOS that is designed to work alongside Windows has the additional advantage of allowing the whole application to be developed and tested on the target platform. In the case of systems using INtime for Windows, both the Windows and the INtime portions of the applications (real-time and non-real-time) can be developed and debugged using Microsoft Visual Studio, an easy-to-use graphically oriented tools package.

The potential applications for haptic robotic control technology abound. Beyond robotic surgery, the technology can be used to control robots working in hazardous areas (e.g., in mining operations), robots handling hazardous materials (e.g., nuclear waste), or robots engaged in manufacturing nanoscale products such as micromachines for biomedical applications.

This article was written by Christophe Grujon, Product Manager at TenAsys Corp., Beaverton, OR. For more information, Click Here 


Motion Control Technology Magazine

This article first appeared in the August, 2010 issue of Motion Control Technology Magazine.

Read more articles from this issue here.

Read more articles from the archives here.