There have been many changes in laser technology over the past 30 years. With each advancement comes new challenges and opportunities. The CO2 laser with 10-micron wavelength was king for many of those years because it was versatile, from cutting thin to thick plates and welding fast while maintaining high quality welds. A little over 10 years ago, high brightness 1-micron wavelength fiber and disk lasers came into the market with great promise. Everyone thought the higher absorption in steel (from ~5% up to now ~40%) (Figure 1) was the holy grail for faster, better and greater flexibility in laser processing, with a 200% increase in energy efficiency.

Figure 1. Wavelength Absorption Curve

Although the lasers were very energy efficient and could even cut 1/8” steel much faster, we started to see challenges come to light. Cutting thick plates was a challenge because the new wavelength was absorbed much better, which meant you had less energy getting to the bottom of the thick plate. These challenges have since been conquered with new cutting optics, steeper angled focusing optics and cutting nozzle design.

Figure 2. BrightLine technology operation

One of the tools TRUMPF developed and patented was BL (BrightLine) using a 2in1, or dual core, delivery fiber (Figure 2). This concept, along with some features in our system design, allows us to put the laser energy in the center core when cutting thin plate steel. When cutting thicker plate, it can activate a switch in the laser to direct the light into the outer core, increasing our spot size for the thicker plate without having to change the optical set up. This gives a quick and easy way to switch from one job to another without changing the dynamics of the system's motion control. Nowadays we can cut foils to 1.0” thick plate steel with disk lasers with ease.

Figure 3. C02 vs 1-micron comparison of HAZ

This was the first hurdle the laser industry took on, as about 80% or more of the lasers sold are used for cutting applications, not welding. In recent years, however, laser welding has grown significantly. Many of the parts being welded today are small and thin gauge materials where traditional MIG & TIG processes will not work. As with cutting, the 1-micron vs 10-micron wavelength provided new challenges. The major benefit of higher absorption was dramatically less heat put into the part, reducing the HAZ (heat affected zone), which allows us to weld faster and use thinner materials (Figure 3).

Figure 4. (left) Spatter with optimize single beam. (right) BLW at the same speed

However, due to the higher absorption in the weld, pool/keyhole formation was much more violent, causing significant spatter (Figures 4 and 5). High spatter results in weaker welds with some material being expelled, moving parts and gears can bind up or get damaged from the debris, and with electronics, it can cause electrical shorts. Maintenance costs increase as more frequent cleaning of tooling/fixturing is required, along with lens protection cover glasses, which can be damaged quickly.

Figure 5. Amount of spatter comparison between standard and BLW

Figure 5 shows the amount of spatter comparison between standard and BLW. We have adjusted spot sizes and found optimal feed rates to reduce the spatter, but they tend to limit processing time. Additionally, many have introduced mechanical shielding methods to protect parts and make cleaning easier. TRUMPF has now introduced a novel new concept, expanding on its Bright-Line cutting mechanism to now offer BLW (BrightLine Weld). BL lets you put laser power in one core or the other; in BLW we split the laser power into both cores at the same time, allowing you to vary power 10 - 90% between the two cores for optimized results (Figure 6). One of the unique features of the TRUMPF TruDisk is the free space optic configuration before launching into the process fiber; we utilize the entire power of the laser and reduce splicing of multiple fiber modules into the core. This enables us, in some cases, to use a 2 or 4 kW BLW laser instead of a 7 or 8 kW fiber spliced design to achieve the same performance.

Figure 6. (left to right) Increasing laser power in outer fiber core

The first application looked at was automotive powertrain welding. The application has controlled pressed fit joints, consistent material quality, and requirements of fast welding, low distortion from heat input, and little to no spatter formation as it goes into a transmission box with many moving gears. BrightLine Weld technology allows a very flexible range of parameters for optimizing energy efficiency or machine productivity. If BrightLine Weld is used to optimize energy efficiency, as shown in Figure 7 on the left, the part can be welded at common feed rates, such as, v = 5 m/min with a laser power of P = 2 kW and a penetration depth of about 3 mm. The spatter formation is low, so no exhaust is required, reducing costs. On the other hand, it is possible to improve the productivity by increasing the feed rate combined with using higher laser power. This case is shown on the right side of Figure 7. The same high-quality weld seam with the low spatter behavior and equal penetration depth can be achieved with three times the weld speed at v = 16 m/min and P = 5 kW.

Figure 7. BLW speed or less laser power

Increasing the feed rate leads to a higher cooling rate of the molten material. The tests were done on an axial seam between a shaft and a disk. The shaft is made of 20MnCr5, the disk with a thickness of 5 mm is made of 16MnCr5. Further investigation of the cross sections of the weld seams show a slim V-shape weld. The weld with BrightLine Weld is narrow compared to state of the art. Similarly, the HAZ is narrower. The cross-sectional areas are 1.08 mm2 for the seam area (comparison state-of-the-art 1.70 mm2) and for the HAZ a total of 0.79 mm2 for both sides (comparison 1.76 mm2). The average welding depth is 3.6 mm.