Thermal-actuation and misalignment-tolerant double-pivot designs are proposed.
advertisement:
Two concepts that could be applied
separately or together have been suggested
to enhance the utility of deployable
truss structures. The concepts were
intended originally for application to a
truss structure to be folded for compact
stowage during transport and subsequently
deployed in outer space. The
concepts may also be applicable, with
some limitations, to deployable truss
structures designed to be used on Earth.
Figure 1. SMA Coil Actuators would apply forces to displace jointed members to unfold a truss structure from compact stowage to a fully deployed condition.
The first concept involves a combination
of features that would help to maximize
reliability of a structure while minimizing
its overall mass, the complexity
of its deployment system, and the expenditure
of energy for deployment. The
deployment system would be integrated
into the truss: some of the truss members
would contain folding/unfoldingdetent
mechanisms similar to those in
umbrellas; other truss members would
contain shape-memory-alloy (SMA) coil
actuators (see Figure 1). Upon exposure
to sunlight, the SMA actuators would be
heated above their transition temperature,
causing them to extend to their
deployment lengths. The
extension of the actuators
would cause the structure
to unfold and, upon completion
of unfolding, the
umbrellalike mechanisms
would lock the unfolded
truss in the fully deployed
configuration. The use of
solar heating to drive
deployment would eliminate
the need to carry a
deployment power source.
The actuation scheme
would offer high reliability
in that the truss geometry
would be such that deployment
could be completed
even if all actuators were
not functioning. Of
course, in designing for
operation in normal
Earth gravitation, it would
be necessary to ensure
that the SMA actuators
could apply forces large enough to overcome the deployment-resisting forces attributable
to the weights of the members.
Figure 2. A Proposed Double-Pivot Joint Design would offer advantages over an older single-off-center-pivot design.
The second concept is that of an improved design for the
joints in folding members. Before describing this design, it is
necessary to describe pertinent aspects of a prior design concept
that this design concept is intended to supplant. In a typical
folding truss structure of prior design, a joint in a folding
member includes a pivot located away from the centerline on
one side and a latch located away from the centerline on the
opposite side (see Figure 2). This entails three disadvantages:
Much of the load is borne by the latch. If the latch is springloaded,
then the spring must be designed so that it poses only
minimal resistance to unfolding and yet applies a substantial
latching preload. At best, it is difficult to satisfy this combination
of requirements, and the joint is vulnerable to dislocation
during loading.
The use of only one pivot necessitates adherence to tight tolerances
in order to accommodate folding.
Pivoting about an off-center point necessitates passage of the
member through an “over-the-center” condition that may be
undesirable.
The present second design concept calls for two pivots, located
a short distance apart and nominally located on the centerline when the member is unfolded. In
comparison with the single-off-centerpivot
arrangement, the two-pivot
arrangement could accommodate large
misalignment in the folded condition.
The joint would include two springs in
an “over-the-center” configuration in
which they would not apply deployment
force while the member remained completely
folded but would apply straightening
force and torque during the final
stages of deployment. Spring-loaded
axial latching pins would snap into place
at completion of deployment. There -
after, the two pivots would bear the main
axial load, while the latching pins would
stabilize the joint against buckling.
This work was done by John W. Renfro of
The Boeing Company for Johnson Space
Center.. For further information, contact the
JSC Innovation Partnerships Office at (281)
483-3809.
This invention is owned by NASA, and a
patent application has been filed. Inquiries
concerning nonexclusive or exclusive license
for its commercial development should be
addressed to the Patent Counsel, Johnson
Space Center, (281) 483-1003. Refer to MSC-23848-1/4142-1.