White Paper: Defense
COUNTER-DRONE DEFENSE: Engineering the Shield Against UAV Threats
SPONSORED BY: ![]()
Modern aerial technologies are reshaping the future of warfare. Countering these threats requires adaptable, multi-layered systems that integrate detection, electronic warfare, directed energy, and kinetic interceptors. Arrow's latest whitepaper explores how engineers can design modular C-UAS architectures supported by AI, advanced sensors, and a traceable supply chain to effectively address these challenges.
Don't have an account?
Overview
The document titled "Counter-Drone Defense: Engineering the Shield Against UAV Threats" discusses the evolution and implications of drone warfare over the past century, emphasizing the growing threat posed by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in modern military conflicts. It highlights the historical context of drone usage, starting from the Kettering "Bug" in World War I, and traces the advancements that have made drones a pivotal component of contemporary warfare.
The proliferation of drones has democratized military capabilities, allowing over 100 countries and non-state actors, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and ISIS, to access and utilize UAV technology. This accessibility has altered the dynamics of military engagement, reducing traditional advantages held by larger, more established military forces. Drones are noted for their versatility, cost-effectiveness, and ability to conduct operations without risking pilot lives, which changes the calculus of military action.
The document categorizes drones based on their size and capabilities, detailing the various types of UAVs—from micro drones used for reconnaissance to large drones like the U.S. MQ-9 Reaper, which can conduct offensive strikes. Each category presents unique challenges for detection and countermeasures. For instance, micro drones are difficult to detect but are limited in payload capacity, while larger drones can operate at high altitudes and speeds, making them more challenging to intercept.
The text also addresses the vulnerabilities that even advanced military forces, such as the U.S. military, face against drone attacks. It cites a specific incident in January 2024, where a drone strike in Jordan resulted in the deaths of three U.S. soldiers, underscoring the asymmetric threat posed by inexpensive and easily deployable UAVs.
In conclusion, the document emphasizes the urgent need for effective counter-drone defense strategies to protect military personnel and assets from the evolving drone threat landscape. It calls for continued innovation and adaptation in defense technologies to address the challenges posed by UAVs in modern warfare, highlighting the importance of developing comprehensive solutions to safeguard against these emerging threats.